利用批注功能提高学术期刊审稿效率   总被引：1，自引：1，他引：0  

季魏红  贾建敏  吴飞盈  毛文明  郑俊海 《编辑学报》2015,27(5):449-450

针对同行评议的现状及学术期刊编辑缺乏专业知识的问题,提出批注式审稿的概念,并论述其在提高审稿质量、帮助编辑提高专业素养、增强学术期刊的可读性方面的优势.建议引导审稿专家采用批注式审稿方法,以提高学术期刊的整体质量.  相似文献   

论文推荐-传播模型构建及评价指标研究          下载免费PDF全文

惠淑敏 《科研管理》2015,36(10):146-152

为应对学术评价活动日益增多、评审成本过高、评价任务繁重等挑战,本文构建学术文献高效获取、研究成果主动推介和科研成果自动评价于一体的论文推荐-传播平台模型,运用仿真方法验证模型性能后提出利用平台用户的推荐-传播行为自动计算衡量学术论文贡献的影响指数、质量指数和价值指数的算法。基于论文推荐-传播平台开展学术评价能够共享科研人员劳动、提高科研群体效率、节省评价费用、使评价结果变得更客观。  相似文献   

Ten Salient Practices of Undergraduate Research Mentors: A Review of the Literature     

Jenny Olin Shanahan  Elizabeth Ackley-Holbrook  Eric Hall  Kearsley Stewart  Helen Walkington 《Mentoring & Tutoring: Partnership in Learning》2015,23(5):359-376

This paper identifies salient practices of faculty mentors of undergraduate research (UR) as indicated in the extensive literature of the past two decades on UR. The well-established benefits for students involved in UR are dependent, first and foremost, on high-quality mentoring. Mentorship is a defining feature of UR. As more and different types of colleges and universities strive to meet student demand for authentic scholarly experiences, it is imperative to identify what effective UR mentors do in order to ensure student engagement, quality enhancement, retention, and degree-completion. We offer an original analysis of the literature on UR mentoring in which we identify 10 significant “lessons learned,” or evidence-based practices of effective UR mentors that apply broadly across disciplines, students, institutions, and mentoring approaches.  相似文献   

朋辈心理辅导在工科院校新生入学适应中的应用——以湖南工程学院为例     

赵玲令 《鸡西大学学报》2015,(5)

朋辈心理辅导是近年来在国内外高校中兴起的一种思想政治教育新模式。湖南工程学院将其应用在工科院校新生的入学适应教育中,从选拔朋辈心理辅导人才,并进行科学系统的培训;创建良好的朋辈教育氛围和环境;积极开展并创新各类朋辈心理辅导和教育活动,使其融亲和性、趣味性和教育性为一体;建立朋辈心理辅导保障机制等几个方面进行了实践探索,结果表明,朋辈心理辅导有助于提高新生的心理自助和帮助他人的能力,有效弥补了专业辅导教师数量和精力的不足,对学校专业心理辅导和教学起到了不可或缺的辅助作用。  相似文献   

认知视角的科学基金项目专家评议意见分析——基于ER规则的研究     

王东鹏  朱卫东  陈波  刘芳 《科学学与科学技术管理》2015,36(4)

科学基金专家评议意见的可解释性会影响项目资助合理性以及项目申请者对评议意见的理解。项目评议时,专家先根据评议要点对项目的科学意义和应用前景等属性进行评价,得出综合意见;科学基金再合成多位专家意见,得出项目评议结论。在此过程中,专家属性意见与综合意见的一致性和专家间的非共识意见是影响专家意见可解释性的主要问题。上述问题可从认知视角分析其影响因素,并利用ER规则量化影响因素、合成专家意见。通过分析量化可界定专家属性意见的一致性权重关系,判断意见是否一致;而专家间的非共识意见也可因此分为"因属性评价意见不同、权重不同或专家意见不一致造成的非共识";最后依据科学基金专家评议的真实信息验证了方法的适用性。  相似文献   

《心理学报》开放性同行评审方式探索及初步成效   总被引：4，自引：4，他引：0  

李金珍  庄景春  邱炳武 《中国科技期刊研究》2015,26(2):139-142

【目的】 为我国科技期刊进行开放性同行评审提供借鉴和思路。 【方法】 介绍了《心理学报》在开放性同行评审方式上的探索,《心理学报》采用了“开放性同行评审”的一种变式——公开审稿意见。 【结果】 经过充分讨论权衡试用“开放性同行评审”方式的利弊后,《心理学报》最终决定采用“公开审稿意见”这种“开放性同行评审”的变式。 【结论】 除不能达到“缩短发表周期”的目标外,公开审稿意见的方式可以实现“开放性同行评审”的大部分初衷。  相似文献   

Social capital in the classroom: a study of in-class social capital and school adjustment     

Ronan Van Rossem  Marjolijn Vermande  Beate Völker  Chris Baerveldt 《British Journal of Sociology of Education》2015,36(5):669-688

Social capital is generally considered beneficial for students’ school adjustment. This paper argues that social relationships among pupils generate social capital at both the individual and the class levels, and that each has its unique effect on pupils’ performance and well-being. The sample in this study consists of 1036 children in 60 first-grade classes in 46 Dutch elementary schools. Multilevel regression results show that a substantial proportion of the variance in school adjustment can be attributed to the class level and that both individual-level and classroom-level social capital have substantial effects on school adjustment. At the individual level, the size of one’s network is more important than its structure. At the collective level, social capital also has a ‘dark side’ because it can have negative effects on adjustment, lowering the academic performance in a class.  相似文献   

Developing,expressing and contesting opinions of science: encouraging the student voice     

S.M. Howitt  A.N. Wilson 《高等教育研究与发展》2015,34(3):541-553

In a typical science degree, little emphasis is placed on the need for scientists to make judgements about evidence and little value is placed on the development of students' opinions about science, with the focus largely on assessment of declarative knowledge. Yet it is the ability to evaluate evidence that is crucial to the development of the student as a scientist. This study assesses the impact on students' conceptions of science of a course that aims to engage students in discussion and reflection on what scientists do and on their own learning about science. Analysis of written reflective assignments from the three years the course has been run shows that participants become more confident in their expression of opinions about science and also develop a more mature view of science and its inherent uncertainty. It appears that a critical factor enabling this development is the way the course activities are designed to explicitly value students' opinions and to provide a supportive environment in which they can be expressed and contested.  相似文献   

The effect of peer group performance on the self-concept of reading in a foreign language     

Rianne Janssen  Sofie Wouters  Tine Huygh  Katrijn Denies  Karine Verschueren 《教育心理学》2015,35(2):158-175

According to the big-fish-little-pond (BFLP) model, the self-concept is not only influenced in a positive way by one’s own achievement, but also in a negative way by one’s relative achievement in comparison with one’s immediate peers. This study investigates whether the BFLP effect also holds for second language acquisition. A random sample of 9167 Dutch-speaking students from Grade 8 took a reading comprehension test in French followed by a short background questionnaire in which they were asked for their self-concept of reading French. Multilevel regressions of the latter on individual and group achievement confirmed the BFLP effect but did not confirm an interaction of the effect with gender, individual achievement or class size. Moreover, in line with the local dominance hypothesis, it was shown that the negative effect of the average performance of peers is stronger for classmates than for schoolmates.  相似文献   

Standing by … standing off – troublesome compassion in the relationships of school boys     

Tuija Huuki  Vappu Sunnari 《Gender and education》2015,27(5):555-574

This paper draws on the story of ‘Mikael’, a schoolboy from northern Finland, to examine how his affective ties of compassion and his pursuit of dominant forms of masculinity evolve in his journey from middle childhood to young adulthood. In his earlier years, Mikael's speech regarding his relationships with peers and family members indicates a non-hierarchical sympathetic orientation, enabling sensitivity to diverse vulnerabilities. Over time, his speech reflects more and more the ideals of dominating masculinity and hierarchical relationality, and it is marked by ‘inner-circle’ compassion that excludes people considered vulnerable and/or ‘Other’. The authors argue that the challenge of balancing compassionate concern, masculinity and social position generates heavy costs, imposing on young men not only the heavy burden of fulfilling the requirements of culturally esteemed masculinity, but also a partial loss of being in touch with one's inner faculties of emotions and imagination.  相似文献